Sample the numbers.
In September this year, during the third national lok adalat, over 41 lakh cases were disposed of on a single day, the website of National Legal Services Authority mentions. With staggering pendency—over four crore cases at at district courts more than 50 lakh at subordinate courts—the contribution of lok adalats is no mean feat.
When Covid-19 pandemic hit, almost all courts came to a standstill. The Karnataka State Legal Services Authority was the first to organise lok adalats in a virtual format. In September 2020, 1,15,000 cases were disposed of.
It’s the best method of alternative dispute resolution, HS Shetty, member secretary of the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, told BloombergQuint.
In courts, parties have to lay out evidence, engage a counsel and follow the procedural law. When arguments start, hearings may take their own time, Shetty said, adding that the participation of parties is direct in lok adalats.
Soon, other states followed suit. According to NALSA, around 8.1 lakh cases were taken up in toto, of which 4.11 lakh were settled via e-lok adalats throughout the country. In the middle of a raging pandemic.
The first lok adalat was conducted in 1982 in Gujarat. The institution got statutory recognition in 1987 under the Legal Services Authorities Act. And the National Legal Services Authority was given the task of organising lok adalats.
Each state has a legal services authority which gives implements the policies and directions of the NALSA and conducts lok adalats. The lok adalats are conducted at four different levels in every state.
At all levels—taluka, district, high court and the state—the member secretary constitutes the lok adalat benches. Every bench has a sitting or retired high court judge or judicial officer. The others on the bench include a member from the legal profession or a social worker. All members, irrespective of their professions, take the role of conciliators and facilitate settlement during the sessions.
And then there are national-level, permanent and mobile lok adalats conducted throughout the country, without state barriers.
A decision by a lok adalat has the same effect as a civil court’s decree, meaning it is final and binding on all parties. Also, litigants cannot appeal against lok adalat orders. They can only go back to courts to litigate the matter afresh.
Virtues of lok adalats aside, the constitution of benches require some fresh thinking, Senior Advocate Jayna Kothari pointed out.
Post that, the matter can be closed by a judge, Kothari added.
Lok adalats have the jurisdiction to hear a range of matters.
Experts BloombergQuint spoke with explained that once a case is referred to a lok adalat, parties are informed. On the day of the adalat, matters are called up. Parties can mutually agree and file a plea. Courts, too, can refer matters to lok adalats. Or one of the parties can make an application to the court in which their case is pending, requesting it to refer the matter to a lok adalat.
If the request is granted, the state or district legal services authority receives an application from the party. The authority then issues a notice to the opposite party.
Lok adalats are known for speedy disposal of cases. To put things in perspective, the first national lok adalat, conducted on April 10 this year, settled over 65,000 pre-litigation cases and over 4.1 lakh pending cases, according to data provided by NALSA.
During the second lok adalat, held on July 10, over 11 lakh pre-litigation cases were settled. Over 15 lakh pending cases were disposed of; 26 lakh cases settled in one day. And the third one, to reiterate, witnessed a settlement in 41 lakh cases.
One of the main reasons for these commendable numbers is penetration into rural areas, Dhyan Chinnappa, senior advocate and additional advocate general of Karnataka, told BloombergQuint.
Funds for functioning of lok adalats are required to come from NALSA and the state. But many states allocate little to nothing towards this cause, as the India Justice report published by Tata Trusts in 2019, pointed out.
On this parameter, Uttar Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh scored well, with 80% of the funding needs met by their respective state governments.
Allocation of funds is a big issue. And so is utilisation.
In 2017-18, only five states managed to use more than 90% of the funds allocated by NALSA. Union Territories like Daman and Diu, and Dadra and Nagar Haveli spent the least, the Tata Trusts’ report noted.
The benefits of lok adalats need to be capitalised more and this must be driven by states and their agencies, experts said.
In courts, one party wins and the other loses. In lok adalats, both the disputing parties go back with something, Chinnappa said.
“This should be capitalised and be one of the main reasons as to why people look up to lok adalats.”
**Names changed to protect identities of parties.